ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Risk of
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Total Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for De Novo Esophageal Cancer after Liver Transplantation: The Potential of Robotic Surgery in a Complex Posttransplant Case.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were completed. The search was completed in November 2023. Standardized incidence rates (SIRs) were used to measure the risk of esophageal cancer among liver transplant recipients, along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). A random effects model was employed for comprehensive analysis, and results were presented using a forest plot. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken by systematically excluding individual studies one by one, while potential publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. Additionally, subgroup analyses were also performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. Results: Out of 1,037 articles collected, only twelve met the inclusion criteria after rigorous screening. Statistical analysis showed a significantly increased risk of esophageal cancer following liver transplantation compared to the general population (SIR =6.75, 95% CI: 4.35-10.46). Conclusions: The risk of esophageal cancer significantly increases after liver transplantation, so regular gastrointestinal endoscopy is necessary after the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.