ArticleCureus2024
Lumbar and Cervical Concurrent Muscle Activity Analysis During Hamstring Length Testing to Design a Customized Treatment Plan: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHamstring length plays a significant role in a spectrum of clinical entities, from injury prevention and gait dysfunction to posture correction. Evidence suggests that the prevalence of hamstring tightness (HT)/reduced length is increasing. Despite the number of available tests and treatment protocols, HT is still a functional diagnosis. This study's primary goal is to evaluate concurrent muscle (CM) usage during these testing procedures to design a unique, customized treatment protocol.
methodsThe study was conducted in two stages. In phase 1, Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR), Active Total Knee Extension (ATKE), and Active Seated Total Knee Extension (ASTKE) were carried out. Next, two pressure gauges (PGs) were placed to align with the natural lumbar and cervical curvatures while testing ASLR and ATKE. After analyzing the results for pressure gauge placement, phase 2 data were collected for tests ASLR and ATKE with PG.
resultsThe results of ASLR and ATKE, both with and without PG, indicate a high prevalence rate, whereas the results of ASTKE show no prevalence. Changes in the PG values indicate CM usage. Dichotomization revealed that participants with normal test scores (non-HT group) had increased usage of CM work. Positive and negative changes in PG indicate the involved CM group. CONCLUSION(S): In regular practice, most healthcare professionals and fitness trainers prefer ASTKE due to the ease of the testing procedure. Directing co-professionals on their choice of tests is challenging, whereas providing knowledge about CM use paves the way for creating customized treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.