ArticleCureus2024
A Prospective Study of Sutured Versus Non-sutured Subcutaneous Fat Tissue in Laparotomy Wound Closure.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background This study was conducted to determine the wound-related complications, such as wound dehiscence, delayed post-operative stay, and reinterventions in both groups, and compare the incidence of surgical site infection in elective laparotomy wounds in two groups - those with closing subcutaneous fat tissue and those without. Methods At the Government Medical College, Thrissur, 248 patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries during the period from August 2019 to August 2020 participated in this one-year prospective cross-sectional study. The institutional ethics committee approved the study, and participants provided written informed consent. Patients were randomly assigned to the subcutaneous closure group (S) and the non-closure group (N). Post-operative events were then systematically documented. Results The group with no subcutaneous suture (N) had a considerably greater percentage of patients with seromas (12 patients, 9%), hematomas (13 patients, 10.5%), superficial surgical site infection and total wound dehiscence as compared to the subcutaneous tissue closure group (S). Groups N and S displayed comparable numbers of suture sinus developments and partial wound dehiscence. Group N and Group S had similar hospital stays, according to the overall length of stay displayed. Conclusion Subcutaneous suturing during elective laparotomy wound closure significantly reduced superficial surgical site infection, hematoma, seroma, and total wound dehiscence; in the remaining categories, subcutaneous and non-subcutaneous sutures did not differ significantly. It also did not help to reduce hospital stays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.