Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38989287›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2024

Grass pollen allergoids conjugated with mannan for subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy: a dose-finding study.

Pedro Ojeda, María Concepción Barjau, Javier Subiza, Antonio Moreno, Isabel Ojeda, Emilio Solano, Alicia Alonso, Raquel Caballero, Sandra Del Pozo, Marta Gómez-Perosanz and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02654223 (Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose Finding, Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial for the Treatment of Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis Against Grass Pollen Allergy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02654223 phase2completednot on this map

Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose Finding, Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial for the Treatment of Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis Against Grass Pollen Allergy

TypeinterventionalSponsorInmunotek S.L.Ran2015 to 2021Enrolled180ConditionsRhinitis, RhinoconjunctivitisArmsMG56 Mannosylated 500 subcutaneous, MG56 Mannosylated 1000 subcutaneous, MG56 Mannosylated 3000 subcutaneous, MG56 Mannosylated 5000 subcutaneous, MG56 Mannosylated 500 sublingual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Efficacy and safety of Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: an overview of systematic reviews and meta analyses.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Allergen Immunotherapy: Pitfalls, Perks and Unexpected Allies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. The recent advances in vaccine adjuvants.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Pedro OjedaClínica de Asma y Alergia Dres. Ojeda, Madrid, Spain.
María Concepción BarjauCentro de Asma y Alergia Subiza, Madrid, Spain.
Javier SubizaCentro de Asma y Alergia Subiza, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio MorenoClínica Atlas, Aranjuez, Spain.
Isabel OjedaClínica de Asma y Alergia Dres. Ojeda, Madrid, Spain.
Emilio SolanoServicio de Alergia, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Alicia AlonsoClínica Alianza Médica, Valladolid, Spain.
Raquel CaballeroInmunotek, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Sandra Del PozoInmunotek, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Marta Gómez-PerosanzInmunotek, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
José Luis Sánchez-TrincadoDepartment of Immunology & O2, School of Medicine, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Benito-VillalvillaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Chemistry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Alba AngelinaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Chemistry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Irene SoriaInmunotek, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Pedro A RecheDepartment of Immunology & O2, School of Medicine, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Oscar PalomaresDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Chemistry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
José Luis SubizaInmunotek, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Miguel CasanovasInmunotek, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Polymerized allergoids conjugated with mannan represent a novel approach of allergen immunotherapy targeting dendritic cells. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal dose of mannan-allergoid conjugates derived from grass pollen ( Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a double-dummy design was conducted, involving 162 participants across 12 centers in Spain. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of nine different treatment groups, each receiving either placebo or active treatment at doses of 500, 1,000, 3,000, or 5,000 mTU/mL over four months. Each participant received five subcutaneous (SC) doses of 0.5 mL each, every 30 days, and a daily sublingual (SL) dose of 0.2 mL. Participants who received active treatment through SC, received placebo through SL. Participants who received active treatment through SL, received placebo SC. One Group, as control, received bot SC and SL placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the improvement in titrated nasal provocation tests (NPT) at the end of the study compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included specific antibody (IgG4, IgE) and cellular (IL-10 producing and regulatory T cell) responses. All adverse events and side reactions were recorded and assessed. Results: Post-treatment, the active groups showed improvements in NPT ranging from 33% to 53%, with the highest doses showing the greatest improvements regardless of the administration route. In comparison, the placebo group showed a 12% improvement. Significant differences over placebo were observed at doses of 3,000 mTU/mL (p=0.049 for SL, p=0.015 for SC) and 5,000 mTU/mL (p=0.011 for SL, p=0.015 for SC). A dose-dependent increase in IgG4 was observed following SC administration, and an increase in IL-10 producing cells for both routes of administration. No serious systemic or local adverse reactions were recorded, and no adrenaline was required. Conclusion: Grass pollen immunotherapy with mannan-allergoid conjugates was found to be safe and efficacious in achieving the primary outcome, whether administered via the subcutaneous or sublingual routes, at doses of 3,000 and 5,000 mTU/mL. Clinical trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search (EudraCT), identifier 2014-005471-88; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02654223.

Indexed as

AllergensAllergoidsDesensitization, ImmunologicMannansPoaceaePollenSublingual ImmunotherapyAdministration, SublingualAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin EInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedAllergensAllergoidsImmunoglobulin EMannansallergoidclinical trialgrass pollenimmunotherapymannanpolymerized

Identifiers

PMID38989287
PMCPMC11233432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.