ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Evaluation of hepatic injury in chronic hepatitis B and C using APRI and FIB-4 indices compared to fibroscan results.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of non-invasive fibrosis markers: Insights from chronic HBV, HBV+HDV, and HCV infections.Infectious medicine · 2025Article
- The role of tetraspanins in organ fibrosis: mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Performance of APRI and FIB-4 Scores Compared to FibroScan: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Black Sub-Saharan African Population.Hepatic medicine : evidence and research · 2025Article
- A machine learning model for non-invasive prediction of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C viruses (HCV) are significant causes of liver disease worldwide. Liver fibrosis (LF) is a complication of chronic liver damage caused by HBV and HCV due to our limited knowledge comparing the diagnostic performance of platelet to aspartate aminotransferase ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index with fibroscan. Methods: This study evaluated liver damage in HBV and HCV using APRI, FIB-4, and fibroscan indices. This retrospective cohort descriptive-analytical study was conducted on patients with HBV and HCV. This study uses laboratory results and imaging to investigate liver damage in chronic HBV and HCV patients. APRI and FIB-4 were computed based on laboratory results. Results: A total of 185 patients (82 hepatitis B and 103 hepatitis C) were included in the study. Thirteen patients had liver cirrhosis. There was no statistically significant difference between the fibroscan results in the two groups ( Conclusion: Fibroscan is a powerful tool superior to APRI and FIB-4 in predicting LF and cirrhosis. Nevertheless, APRI and FIB-4 are inexpensive and non-invasive indicators with acceptable efficacy in predicting advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. However, these two measures are not reliable in low-grade fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.