ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Prognostic value of systemic inflammation score in patients with esophageal cancer.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric examination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in esophageal cancer: insights, trends, collaborative networks, and prospective directions.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Observational
- Radiomics and prognostic nutritional index for predicting postoperative survival in esophageal carcinoma.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- The First Comprehensive Evaluation of Immuno-Inflammatory Markers for Prognosis in Esophageal Cancer Patients: A South Asian Perspective.Clinics and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The systemic inflammatory score (SIS), a new inflammatory marker based on a combination of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and serum albumin concentration, has been reported to be a useful prognostic marker for several malignancies. The authors conducted this retrospective study on data from a cohort of esophageal cancer patients undergoing potentially curative resection to clarify the value of SIS as a prognostic marker for clinical outcome in this population. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 32 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer between January 2016 and December 2019. Blood samples were collected within one week prior to the initiation of preoperative chemotherapy. Three inflammatory and nutritional markers; SIS, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and prognostic nutrition index (PNI) were examined in this study. Disease-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariable and multivariable Cox models were applied to evaluate the predictive value of SIS, NLR and PNI. Results: NLR and PNI were not associated with recurrence, while SIS scores of 1 and 2 were significantly associated with recurrence. In multivariate analysis, SIS scores of 1 or 2 were found to be independently associated with recurrence, each with a hazard ratio of 1.98. In addition, when examining immunologic and nutritional factors and survival rates, there was no significant difference in the survival rate for NLR and PNI; for SIS, however, the survival rate was significantly worse in patients with SIS scores of 1 or 2. Conclusions: The authors demonstrated that a novel and easily obtained prognostic score, termed SIS, based on pre-treatment serum albumin and LMR, can serve as an independent prognostic factor in postoperative esophageal cancer patients. It could be incorporated into conventional clinical and pathological algorithms to enhance the prognostic accuracy in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.