Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38989004›Full record

ArticleNature reviews psychology2024

Predictive processing of scenes and objects.

Marius V Peelen, Eva Berlot, Floris P de Lange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. How Does Peripheral Vision Feel Rich? A Selective Review.Journal of eye movement research · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Distinct Mechanisms for Panoramic and Landmark-Based View Integration in Human Place-Selective Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anchor objects guide spatial attention during visual search.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Characterizing internal models of the visual environment.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Representational Organization of Static and Dynamic Visual Features in the Human Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marius V PeelenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eva BerlotDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Floris P de LangeDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Research Council 101000942European Research Council 725970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-world visual input consists of rich scenes that are meaningfully composed of multiple objects which interact in complex, but predictable, ways. Despite this complexity, we recognize scenes, and objects within these scenes, from a brief glance at an image. In this review, we synthesize recent behavioral and neural findings that elucidate the mechanisms underlying this impressive ability. First, we review evidence that visual object and scene processing is partly implemented in parallel, allowing for a rapid initial gist of both objects and scenes concurrently. Next, we discuss recent evidence for bidirectional interactions between object and scene processing, with scene information modulating the visual processing of objects, and object information modulating the visual processing of scenes. Finally, we review evidence that objects also combine with each other to form object constellations, modulating the processing of individual objects within the object pathway. Altogether, these findings can be understood by conceptualizing object and scene perception as the outcome of a joint probabilistic inference, in which "best guesses" about objects act as priors for scene perception and vice versa, in order to concurrently optimize visual inference of objects and scenes.

Identifiers

PMID38989004
PMCPMC7616164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.