Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988993›Full record

ArticleBehaviour2023

Prey size preference in the tokay gecko (

Anja Probst, Eva Ringler, Birgit Szabo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behaviour, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anja ProbstDivision of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3032 Bern, Switzerland.
Eva RinglerDivision of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3032 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3226-8621
Birgit SzaboDivision of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3032 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3273-6568

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 31518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal foraging theory posits that animals aim to maximize energy intake while minimizing predation and handling costs during foraging. Most observed animal behaviour supports this theory, but occasional deviations provide insights into the ecological factors that shape foraging decisions. We tested prey-size preference using a two-choice test between different prey sizes in tokay geckos. We expected geckos to prefer larger prey and decision latencies to be longer when discrimination was more difficult and when small prey was offered. Geckos preferred larger prey when the size difference was large, although decision latency remained consistent. This aligns with prior research on sit-and-wait predators. Together with previous findings showing freezing behaviour after prey capture in tokay geckos, our findings suggest a strong influence of predator avoidance on foraging decisions opening up a new avenue for future research investigating the link between decision making and predator avoidance in tokay geckos.

Indexed as

cognitionforagingreptilespontaneous quantity discriminationSquamata

Identifiers

PMID38988993
PMCPMC7616155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.