Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988963›Full record

ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology

Comparative evaluation of thermal impact of 980nm diode laser on soft tissue using irrigation and non-irrigation systems: A histomorphometric study.

Bharmappa Radhika, Sharath Wodeyar Shivaswamy, Amit Walvekar, Kunaal Dhingra, Rashmi Somashekhar Pattanshetty, Raju Shashidara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bharmappa RadhikaDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, Karnataka, India.
Sharath Wodeyar ShivaswamyDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, Karnataka, India.
Amit WalvekarDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, Karnataka, India.
Kunaal DhingraDepartment of Periodontics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rashmi Somashekhar PattanshettyDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, Karnataka, India.
Raju ShashidaraDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diode laser is one of the most captivating technologies in dental practice. In periodontics, when used at appropriate settings, it possesses the best properties for selective surgical and nonsurgical procedures such as subgingival calculus removal without a thermal change of the root surface, and also provides tissue surface sterilization. However, lasers always produce a certain amount of thermal damage to the soft tissues. Therefore, this study aimed to comparatively evaluate the thermal impact of 980-nm diode laser incisions, when used with irrigation versus nonirrigation systems. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 24 gingival tissue samples obtained from the goat's mandible and maxilla. The samples were divided into two groups of 12 samples each, and laser incisions were given in 4 power settings, using 980-nm diode laser in super short pulse mode, with and without saline irrigation. Martius Scarlet Blue staining technique was used to prepare the histological slides. Then, slides were examined under a research microscope (Olympus CX 21), and the pictures of the slides were taken by mounting the camera onto the microscope mobile mount. The microscopic images hence obtained were analyzed for the depth and width of the incisions, area of carbonization, necrosis, and reversible damage, using the Digimizer image analysis software. Results: The results of this study demonstrated that the mean incision depth was higher (592.49 ± 180.97, Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that using an irrigation system causes less collateral damage while maintaining the incising efficiency of the diode laser. Further studies with a higher sample size, controlled irrigation systems, and incision techniques are needed to evaluate the efficiency of diode lasers for the clinical explanation of the results.

Indexed as

Diode lasergingivahistologyMartius Scarlet Bluenecrosisthermal damage

Identifiers

PMID38988963
PMCPMC11232811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.