ReviewJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Evaluation of bone apposition on surface modified titanium implant in experimental animal model: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Break-Even Point to Dynamic Regenerative Balance: A Conceptual and Quantitative Framework Based on Preclinical Rabbit Sinus Lift Data.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Controlling Sodium Titanate Crystal Size to Improve Wettability and Early Osseointegration of Titanium Implants: Insights from an Animal Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the response of peri-implant bone to smooth (machined) surface and surface-modified dental implants in healthy experimental animal models. Materials and Methods: Systematic electronic search was done for using PUBMED, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, and EMBASE databases for potentially relevant records from the last 20 years. Duplicate screening and data extraction were performed to formulate the evidence tables and meta-analysis following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The outcome criteria were: 1. Bone Implant Contact (BIC) in percentage, 2. Removal Torque Values (RTV) in Ncm, 3. Implant stability Quotient (ISQ), Quality assessment was done using the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines and SYRCLE RoB (Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation Risk of Bias) tool. Results: Results were expressed as pooled mean difference for the respective groups viz. sandblasted and acid etched, laser modified, acid etched and anodized surface. The surface modified implants revealed somewhat higher BIC over machined surface ( Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the authors found a higher degree of osseointegration pertaining to bone to implant interface, RTV, and implant stability quotient (ISQ) with surface modified procedures which seemed to promote bone formation around peri-implant tissue during the early stages of healing. After analyzing all 37 included publications for the outcome of interest (BIC%, RTV, ISQ), a positive outcome was obtained for both subtractive and additive implant surface modifying procedures over machined implant surfaces when the data were pooled together. More advanced research work on healthy animal models needs to be investigated to review the impact of surface modifications on dental implant osseointegration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.