Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988931›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2024

Combining non-invasive liquid biopsy and a methylation analysis to assess surgical risk for early esophageal cancer.

Xiaole Chen, Mingyan Li, Yongliang Li, Alberto Aiolfi, Luigi Bonavina, Toni Lerut, Xiuxia Wu, Qinsheng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaole ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Spleen and Stomach, Henan Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Mingyan LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Spleen and Stomach, Henan Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Yongliang LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Spleen and Stomach, Henan Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Alberto AiolfiDivision of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Luigi BonavinaDivision of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan Medical School, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Toni LerutSurgery KULeuven, Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Xiuxia WuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Spleen and Stomach, Henan Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Qinsheng ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Spleen and Stomach, Henan Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5960-0543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While the widespread use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has significantly reduced the incidence of early esophageal cancer (ESCA), the limited ability of ESD to strip deep infiltrating esophageal lesions results in a considerable risk of intraoperative perforation. Circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) is widely used in modern tumor screening due to its non-invasive detection capabilities. A methylation analysis offers vital insights into the condition and advancement of malignancies due to its unique positioning, such as a marker of cancer. This study investigated the potential of combining a non-invasive liquid biopsy technique, along with a methylation analysis, to assess the surgical perforation risk of ESCA patients. Methods: In this study, we conducted an analysis of gene expression differences between stage I esophageal squamous carcinoma samples and healthy tissue samples using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. We also identified the genes associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in esophageal squamous carcinoma. Integrating the framework of the methylation analysis, we explored the methylated sites of these distinct genes. To refine this process, we used the Shiny Methylation Analysis Resource Tool (SMART) to conduct a comprehensive analysis of these sites. We then confirmed the stability of the methylation sites in different lesion conditions using methylation-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (MS-qPCR) with paraffin tissue samples collected after ESD. Results: We analyzed RNA-sequencing data from 42 early stage ESCA patients and 17 controls, identifying 1,263 up-regulated and 460 down-regulated genes. Functional analyses revealed involvement in key pathways such as cell cycle regulation and immune responses. Furthermore, we identified 38 differentially expressed genes associated with PFS. Using SMART analysis, we found 217 hyper-methylated regions in 38 genes, suggesting potential early markers for ESCA. Validation experiments confirmed the reliability of 29 hyper-methylated regions in FFPE tissue samples and 6 regions in cfDNA. A LunaCAM model showed high accuracy [area under the curve (AUC) =0.89] in discriminating early ESCA. Integrated assessment of six highly methylated regions significantly improved predictive performance, with 90.56% sensitivity, highlighting the importance of combinatorial biomarker evaluation for early cancer detection. Conclusions: This study established a novel approach that integrates non-invasive testing with a methylation analysis to assess the surgical risk of early ESCA patients. The significance of changes in methylation sites in relation to lesion status should not be underestimated, as they have the potential to offer vital insights for proactive risk assessments before surgery.

Indexed as

esophageal cancer (ESCA)Liquid biopsymethylation analysisnon-invasive testing

Identifiers

PMID38988931
PMCPMC11231771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.