ArticleTranslational cancer research2024
Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram to predict survival in patients aged ≥60 years with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which accounts for the vast majority of pancreatic cancer (PC), is a highly aggressive malignancy with a dismal prognosis. Age is shown to be an independent factor affecting survival outcomes in patients with PDAC. Our study aimed to identify prognostic factors and construct a nomogram to predict survival in PDAC patients aged ≥60 years. Methods: Data of PDAC patients aged ≥60 years were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determined prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), and two nomograms were constructed and validated by calibration plots, concordance index (C-index) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, 432 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University were included as an external cohort. Kaplan-Meier curves were applied to further verify the clinical validity of the nomograms. Results: Ten independent prognostic factors were identified to establish the nomograms. The C-indexes of the training and validation groups based on the OS nomogram were 0.759 and 0.760, higher than those of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system (0.638 and 0.636, respectively). Calibration curves showed high consistency between predictions and observations. Better area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) values and DCA were also obtained compared to the TNM system. The risk stratification based on the nomogram could distinguish patients with different survival risks. Conclusions: We constructed and externally validated a population-based survival-predicting nomogram for PDAC patients aged ≥60 years. The new model could help clinicians personalize survival prediction and risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.