Efficiency of Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) in Relation to Tru-Cut Biopsy of Lateral Neck Swellings.

Background Lateral neck masses have always been difficult to diagnose without proposing a differential diagnosis. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was proposed to be a cost-effective method and less invasive than a tru-cut biopsy and may provide a provisional diagnosis in relation to cytopathology. FNA has also been shown to improve the diagnosis of neck masses such as cervical lymphadenopathy, neck cysts, and parotid masses, whether malignant or benign. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of FNA cytopathology versus a tru-cut biopsy histopathological examination. Materials and methods This study was conducted retrospectively in King Hussein Medical Hospital, Royal Medical Services, Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, from January 2019 to January 2024. Ethical approval was taken to conduct this study with reference number 06/2024. All patients included in this study have given verbal and written consent to perform FNA and surgical tru-cut biopsy. The inclusion of patients was based on any person above the age of 16 who underwent an FNA followed by a surgical biopsy to correlate with the primary diagnosis. Exclusion criteria involved any patient who missed one of the above criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v29 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US) with significant results considered with a p-value <0.05. Results A total of 107 patients were included in this study. A correlation between FNA results and final histopathological biopsy was done with an accuracy of 90.6%, specificity of 94.3, predictive positive value of 73.6%, and negative predictive value of 94.3%. There was a statistical significance between FNA and tru-cut biopsy with a p-value of <0.001. Conclusion FNA is a great tool to consider when diagnosing lateral neck swellings. Since it was statistically significant, FNA should be considered for any lateral neck swelling before any surgical tru-cut biopsy for a definitive diagnosis.