ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2024
Effect of palliative radiation dose on symptom response in metastatic sarcomas.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guideline
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Palliative radiotherapy (RT) plays a crucial role in alleviating symptoms associated with metastatic sarcoma. However, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal palliative radiation dose and fractionation for metastatic sarcomas. We analyzed the association between biologically effective radiation dose and symptom response for patients who underwent palliative RT for metastatic sarcomas. Methods and materials: We retrospectively identified patients with metastatic sarcoma treated with palliative RT between 1999 and 2021 at our institution. We assessed the association between equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) with an α/β of three and symptom relief or overall survival (OS) using univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: Of the 198 metastatic sites treated, the most common indications for palliative radiation were pain (n = 181, 91 %) and compression of adjacent structures (n = 16, 8 %). In our analysis, an EQD2 of > 20 Gy was associated with greater rates of short-term symptom relief (n = 143, 85 %) at the RT site compared to an EQD2 of ≤ 20 Gy (n = 14, 54 %, P = 0.001) with no reports of grade 3 or higher toxicity. However, there was no significant improvement in short-term symptom relief for higher radiation doses. Patients treated with an EQD2 of ≤ 20 Gy had a significantly worse performance status, but there was no significant difference in overall survival based on EQD2 on multivariable analysis. Conclusions: An EQD2 ≤ 20 Gy (e.g., 8 Gy in 1 fraction) provided inadequate palliative benefit in this series. An EQD2 > 20 Gy resulted in greater rates of symptom palliation in metastatic sarcomas, but further dose escalation did not improve symptom response or durability. These findings suggest standard palliative regimens such as 20 Gy in 5 fractions (EQD2 of 28 Gy) are effective for patients with metastatic sarcomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.