ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Facial Changes Post-Orthognathic Surgery: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies in Orthognathic and Reconstructive Maxillofacial Surgery: Data Availability and Evidence Maturity.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Orthognathic Surgery: A Scoping Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and robotic technologies redefining precision and personalization in orthopedic surgery: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Text-Guided Inpainting for Aesthetic Prediction in Orthofacial Surgery: A Patient-Centered AI Approach.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2025Review
- AI-Driven Advancements in Orthodontics for Precision and Patient Outcomes.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate prediction of facial soft tissue changes post-orthognathic surgery is crucial for treatment planning and patient communication. Current models pose limitations due to the complexity of facial biomechanics and individual variances. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as an important tool in many disciplines, including the dental field. Objectives: The aim of this scoping review is to assess the accuracy of AI in predicting facial changes post-orthognathic surgery in comparison to traditional models. Explore the strengths and limitations of the current AI models. Material and Methods: Following PRISMA-DTA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted manually and through Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was conducted, focusing on studies that applied AI models with various machine learning and deep learning algorithms for post-surgical outcome prediction. Selection criteria were based on the PICO format, emphasizing studies that compared AI-predicted outcomes with actual post-surgical results. Literature was searched until January 31, 2024. Results: The initial search result yielded 1579 records. After screening and assessment for eligibility, seven studies met the inclusion criteria, with publication dates ranging from 2009 to 2023. Several AI algorithms were evaluated on different orthognathic surgical procedures, revealing the high predictive accuracy of AI models across various facial regions. Conclusions: AI demonstrates significant potential for enhancing the precision of facial outcome predictions following orthognathic surgery. However, despite the promising results, limitations such as small sample sizes and a lack of external validation were noted. Further research with larger, more diverse datasets and standardized validation methods is essential for optimizing AI's clinical utility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.