Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988708›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Multiple immune-related adverse events secondary to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced cancer: association with treatment effectiveness.

Cecilia Olsson Ladjevardi, Anthoula Koliadi, Viktoria Rydén, Ali Inan El-Naggar, Evangelos Digkas, Antonios Valachis, Gustav J Ullenhag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cecilia Olsson LadjevardiDepartment of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anthoula KoliadiDepartment of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Viktoria RydénDepartment of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ali Inan El-NaggarDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Evangelos DigkasDepartment of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Antonios Valachis *Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Gustav J Ullenhag *Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) are widely used in cancer treatment with a potential of causing immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Several studies have reported a positive correlation between development of IRAEs and improved survival outcome. However, few studies have focused on the potential role of multiple IRAEs on treatment effectiveness. This study aimed at investigating the association between multiple IRAEs and treatment effectiveness in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced cancer patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at three Swedish centers. All patients (n=600) treated with PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitor, in monotherapy or in combination for advanced cancer between January 2017 and December 2021 were included. Multiple IRAEs were defined as IRAEs involving more than one organ system either simultaneously or sequentially. Time-depending Cox-regression model to mitigate the risk for immortal time bias (ITB) was applied. Results: The major tumor types were non-small cell lung cancer (205 patients; 34.2%) and malignant melanoma (196 patients; 32.7%). Of all patients,32.8% developed single IRAE and 16.2% multiple IRAEs. Patients with multiple IRAEs showed significantly improved PFS (Hazard Ratio, HR=0.78 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 0.57-0.98) and OS (HR=0.65 95% CI: 0.44-0.95) compared to patients with single IRAE or no IRAE (HR=0.46 95% CI:0.34-0.62 for PFS vs HR=0.41 95% CI: 0.28-0.60 for OS). Conclusion: In conclusion, our data supports a stronger association between development of multiple as opposed to single IRAEs and clinical effectiveness in advanced cancer patients treated with CPIs.

Indexed as

advanced cancercheckpoint inhibitorscohort studyimmortal time biasmultiple immune-related adverse events

Identifiers

PMID38988708
PMCPMC11233440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.