Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988605›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Leveraging machine learning to develop a postoperative predictive model for postoperative urinary retention following lumbar spine surgery.

Samuel L Malnik, Ken Porche, Yusuf Mehkri, Sijia Yue, Carolina B Maciel, Brandon P Lucke-Wold, Steven A Robicsek, Matthew Decker, Katharina M Busl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samuel L Malnik *Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Ken Porche *Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Yusuf MehkriLillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Sijia YueDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Carolina B MacielDepartments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Brandon P Lucke-WoldLillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Steven A RobicsekDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Matthew DeckerLillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Katharina M BuslDepartments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is the inability to urinate after a surgical procedure despite having a full bladder. It is a common complication following lumbar spine surgery which has been extensively linked to increased patient morbidity and hospital costs. This study hopes to development and validate a predictive model for POUR following lumbar spine surgery using patient demographics, surgical and anesthesia variables. Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study of 903 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery over the period of June 2017 to June 2019 in a tertiary academic medical center. Four hundred and nineteen variables were collected including patient demographics, ICD-10 codes, and intraoperative factors. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operation (LASSO) regression and logistic regression models were compared. A decision tree model was fitted to the optimal model to classify each patient's risk of developing POUR as high, intermediate, or low risk. Predictive performance of POUR was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Results: 903 patients were included with average age 60 ± 15 years, body mass index of 30.5 ± 6.4 kg/m Conclusion: We present a highly accurate and easy to implement decision tree model which predicts POUR following lumbar spine surgery using preoperative and intraoperative variables.

Indexed as

lumbar surgerymachine learningpostoperative complicationsrisk factorsurinary catheterizationurinary retention

Identifiers

PMID38988605
PMCPMC11233696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.