Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988594›Full record

ArticlePhytoKeys2024

Ten lessons learned from the mass digitisation of a herbarium collection.

Sofie De Smedt, Ann Bogaerts, Niko De Meeter, Mathias Dillen, Henry Engledow, Paul Van Wambeke, Frederik Leliaert, Quentin Groom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PhytoKeys, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sofie De SmedtMeise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7690-0468
Ann BogaertsMeise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3435-2605
Niko De MeeterMeise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.
Mathias DillenMeise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3973-1252
Henry EngledowMeise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-8006
Paul Van WambekeMeise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.
Frederik LeliaertMeise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4627-7318
Quentin GroomMeise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0596-5376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, herbaria maintain collections of reference specimens representing global plant diversity. These collections are a valuable resource for fundamental botanical research and applied scientific research across various disciplines, and play a significant role in addressing major societal challenges such as biodiversity conservation. The digitisation of herbarium specimens and their online dissemination is one of the most important recent developments in the curation of these collections. Digitisation significantly enhances access to the collections for the research community and facilitates large-scale analysis of biodiversity data. Digitisation also provides a means for preserving the physical specimens, as it reduces the need for handling and transportation. Rapid technological developments have greatly accelerated the rate of databasing and digital imaging of collections. Meise Botanic Garden recently completed a six-year project to mass digitise its herbarium collections of about 3 million specimens mounted on sheets and through this process we have learned valuable lessons. We have captured our experience in 10 recommendations for other collection-holding institutions to take inspiration from as they start planning their own digitisation efforts. We also present case studies where we delve deeper into certain topics as examples.

Indexed as

Biodiversity informaticsdigitisationherbarium specimensnatural history collectionstaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID38988594
PMCPMC11233984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.