ArticleHeliyon2024
Maternity waiting home utilization among women who gave birth in the pastoralist communities of Borana Zone, Ethiopia: A community-based mixed-method study design.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Maternity Waiting Home (MWH) utilization is valuable for enhancing maternal and neonatal health service utilization. Although few studies have been conducted in non-pastoral areas, more evidence is needed from pastoralist communities. Hence, the study aimed to assess the utilization of MWH and its associated factors among women in pastoralist communities in Ethiopia. Methods: A concurrent mixed-method design was conducted from 10 Augustto15 September 2021. The cluster sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Qualitative data was collected through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Multivariable logistic regression analysis is used to identify significant factors. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed and triangulated with quantitative findings. Results: Only 13 % (95%CI:10.5-15.6) of women had utilized MWHs. Husbands participation in antenatal care (AOR = 5.54, 95%CI: 2.14-14.35), having caregivers at home (AOR = 2.59, 95%CI: 1.14-4.86), attending pregnant-women conferences (AOR = 5.01, 95%CI: 2.17-11.49), the husband received information about MWH (AOR = 3.6, 95%CI: 1.54-8.49), favorable attitude towards MWH (AOR = 3.15, 95%CI:1.47-6.77), birth during the rainy season (AOR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.15-0.81) and residing within 10 km of a health center (AOR = 0.15,95%CI:0.04-0.58) were significantly associated with MWH utilization. The main themes that emerged as barriers to MWH utilization were lack of awareness, availability and accessibility of the services, norms and perceptions, lack of decision-making power, family support and women's workload. Conclusion: The study found low utilization of MWHs. Husbands' involvement, having information about MWHs, a favorable attitude, the season of birth, and distance were significantly associated. Lack of transportation access, norms, and limited awareness of MWH were also found to be barriers to service utilization. Health education to raise awareness about the importance of MWHs, enabling transportation access, husbands' involvement, and encouraging women to take an active role in household decision-making are crucial to boosting MWH utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.