ArticleHeliyon2024
Multiparameter MRI-based radiomics analysis for preoperative prediction of type II endometrial cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI-Based Radiomics Model for Predicting Eligibility for Conservative Management of Endometrial Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Preoperative prediction of the HER2 status and prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer using multiparametric MRI-based radiomics: a multicenter study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics and deep learning for differentiating uterine serous carcinoma from endometrioid carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on multiparameter MRI for preoperative differentiation of type II and type I endometrial carcinoma (EC). Methods: A total of 403 EC patients from two centers were retrospectively recruited (training cohort, 70 %; validation cohort, 30 %). Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging at delayed phase(DCE4), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Following dimensionality reduction, radiomics models were developed by logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), bootstrap aggregating (Bagging), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and naive bayes (NB) algorithms. The diagnostic performance of each radiomics model was evaluated using the ROC curve. A nomogram was constructed by incorporating the optimal radiomics signatures with significant clinical-radiological features and immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers obtained from preoperative curettage specimens. The diagnostic performance and clinical value of the nomogram were evaluated using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Among the radiomics models, the NB model, developed from 12 radiomics features derived from ADC and DCE4 sequences, exhibited strong performance in both training and validation sets, with the AUC values of 0.927 and 0.869, respectively. The nomogram, incorporating the radiomics model with significant clinical-radiological features and IHC markers, demonstrated superior performance in both the training (AUC = 0.951) and the validation sets (AUC = 0.915). Additionally, it exhibited excellent calibration and clinical utility. Conclusions: The radiomics nomogram has great potential to differentiate type II from type I EC, which may be an effective tool to guide clinical decision-making for EC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.