ArticleHeliyon2024
Examination of coronoid foramen and coronoid canal with CBCT.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the prevalence and morphometric characteristics of coronoid foramen by cone beam computed tomography.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Anterior Disc Displacement and Cortication Patterns in the Temporomandibular Joint.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine the coronoid foramen using CBCT not only according to its localization, distribution to gender and age but also to determine whether there are canals associated with the coronoid foramen and to identify them and their clinical significance. Methods: 488 images obtained between 2022 and 2023 were retrospectively evaluated in sagittal, horizontal, and coronal sections. During the evaluation of the images, the number and localization of the coronoid foramen and the coronoid canals originating from this foramen were recorded and examined. In addition, the patient images were divided into different age groups and the presence of coronoid foramen was analyzed. Results: Coronoid foramen was detected in 5.1 % and coronoid canal in 1.6 % of the images. Unilateral coronoid foramen was found in 1.4 % and bilateral coronoid foramen was found in 3.7 % of the patients. Unilateral coronoid canal was found in 1.0 % and bilateral coronoid canal in 0.6 % of the patients. When the presence of coronoid foramen was analyzed according to age groups, no significant difference was found between age groups. Conclusion: Recognition of the coronoid foramen and coronoid canal will not only reduce the likelihood of complications in surgical procedures but also influence the treatment plan. Further research is needed to recognize the content of this variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.