ArticleHeliyon2024
Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer among oncologists in China: A survey study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impacts of neoadjuvant therapy on subsequent surgical difficulty, safety, and outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer: a narrative review.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in ypT0-2 N0 rectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This cross-sectional survey study aimed to explore the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for rectal cancer (RC) among specialists in Hainan Province, China. RC specialists working in Hainan Province (China) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study between March and June 2023. A self-designed questionnaire was used to collect the participants' characteristics and KAP toward TNT for RC. A total of 279 valid questionnaires were collected. The KAP scores were 15.91 ± 6.02 (possible range: 0-24), 34.16 ± 5.11 (possible range: 10-50), and 12.42 ± 1.83 (possible range: 3-15), respectively. The KAP scores of specialists who had applied TNT in clinical practice or research and had evaluated RC patients treated with TNT were significantly higher than those who had not (all P < 0.05). The structural equation model showed that knowledge of TNT directly affected attitude (β = 0.292, P = 0.007) and practice (β = 0.912, P = 0.007), and attitude toward TNT also had a direct effect on practice (β = 1.047, P = 0.008). In conclusion, RC specialists in Hainan (China) had inadequate knowledge, negative attitudes, and sufficient practice toward TNT in Hainan Province, China. It is necessary to enhance education for RC specialists to improve their knowledge and attitude toward TNT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.