Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988490›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2024

Tislelizumab in previously treated, locally advanced unresectable/metastatic microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient solid tumors.

Jian Li, Ye Xu, Aimin Zang, Yunong Gao, Quanli Gao, Yanqiao Zhang, Dong Wang, Jianming Xu, Ying Yuan, Haiping Jiang and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advances in integrating biomaterials with CAR-T cells for enhancing solid tumor therapy.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Colorectal Cancers and Immunotherapy.Cancer treatment and research · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Jian LiState Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Ye XuDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Aimin ZangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China.
Yunong GaoKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Gynecology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Quanli GaoDepartment of Immunotherapy, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yanqiao ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China.
Dong WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing 400030, China.
Jianming XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, the Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China.
Ying YuanDepartment of Medical Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China.
Haiping JiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Jieer YingDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, China.
Chunmei ShiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Yanhong DengDepartment of Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha 410013, China.
Tianshu LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yi HuangDepartment of Immunotherapy, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan 430079, China.
Xiaoping QianDepartment of Medical Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.
Yueyin PanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230001, China.
Ying ChengDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun 130012, China.
Sheng HuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan 430079, China.
Jin WangClinical Development, BeiGene (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200001, China.
Mengyue ShiClinical Development, BeiGene (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200001, China.
Ke WangBiostatistics, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China.
Han HuBiostatistics, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China.
Lin ShenState Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The open-label, phase II RATIONALE-209 study evaluated tislelizumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody) as a tissue-agnostic monotherapy for microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors. Methods: Adults with previously treated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors were enrolled. Patients received tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. Objective response rate (ORR; primary endpoint), duration of response (DoR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by independent review committee (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1). Results: Eighty patients were enrolled and treated; 75 (93.8%) patients had measurable disease at baseline. Most had metastatic disease and received at least one prior therapy for advanced/metastatic disease (n=79; 98.8%). At primary analysis (data cutoff July 8, 2021; median follow-up 15.2 months), overall ORR [46.7%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 35.1-58.6; one-sided P<0.0001] and ORR across tumor-specific subgroups [colorectal (n=46): 39.1% (95% CI, 25.1-54.6); gastric/gastroesophageal junction (n=9): 55.6% (95% CI, 21.2-86.3); others (n=20): 60.0% (95% CI, 36.1-80.9)] were significantly greater with tislelizumab Conclusions: Tislelizumab demonstrated a significant ORR improvement in patients with previously treated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR tumors and was generally well tolerated.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDNA mismatch repairimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmicrosatellite instabilityphase II clinical trialsprogrammed cell death 1 receptor

Identifiers

PMID38988490
PMCPMC11230881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.