ReviewFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing)2024
Charting a Path Toward Improving Detection and Clinical Outcomes for Eating Disorders in Cismales and Gender-Diverse Patients.
Review in Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preliminary validation of developmental weight suppression in youth with transdiagnostic eating disorders.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Weight Stigma in Medicine.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Historically, eating disorders (EDs) have been conceptualized from a female-centric lens. However, consistent research demonstrates that EDs afflict individuals across the gender spectrum, including cismales and gender-diverse individuals. Despite this evidence, a consensus regarding gender-sensitive assessment practices, theoretical formulations, and treatment considerations has yet to be established. The present review briefly summarizes research to date on the presentation of EDs in cismales and gender-diverse individuals, suggests appropriate assessment and treatment practices, and offers recommendations for gender-inclusive ED treatment. To effectively serve patients with EDs across the gender spectrum, more research is needed to validate gender-sensitive assessment tools, comprehensively study ED pathology within gender-representative samples, and conduct randomized controlled trials that serve cismales and gender-diverse patients. In doing so, clinicians and researchers may better detect EDs across the gender spectrum and implement gender-appropriate, evidence-based interventions, thereby reducing impairment and mortality related to EDs for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.