ArticleOncology letters2024
Prognostic analysis of systemic antitumor therapy in young patients with advanced liver cancer: A cohort study.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the association between chemotherapy and prognosis among patients less than 50 years old with hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study based on the SEER database.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Identifying key predictors of mortality and liver decompensation in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transarterial radioembolization.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes of AFP-Negative Patients with Advanced HCC: A Propensity-Matched Analysis from a Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced liver cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the elderly, but it also occurs in young people in areas where hepatitis B virus is prevalent. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of systemic antitumor therapy in young patients with advanced liver cancer and investigate the influencing factors. The baseline demographic and clinical data of 38 young patients (≤35 years old) with liver cancer were collected as group A and that of 79 elderly patients (≥55 years old) with liver cancer were collected as group B. There were no significant between-group differences regarding the proportion of patients with increased serum aspartate aminotransferase, low serum albumin, increased α-fetoprotein (AFP) and high Child-Pugh score. The median (m)PFS time in groups A and B was 3.9 and 8.3 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 1.702; P=0.009]. The mOS in group A (17.6 months) was 12.4 months shorter than that in group B (HR, 1.799; P=0.010). In the subgroup analysis, male sex [HR, 1.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-2.79], pathological diagnosis (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.10-2.91), previous surgical treatment (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.18-3.95), no tumor thrombus (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.22-4.93), increased alanine aminotransferase (HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.07-4.65), increased aspartate aminotransferase (HR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.62-6.39), normal total bilirubin (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.09-2.87) and increased AFP (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.19-3.41) were associated with shorter survival time in group A compared with those in group B (P<0.05). Group A also had a higher incidence of hyper-progressive disease (HPD) (31.6 vs. 3.8%; P<0.001). HPD was a risk factor for advanced liver cancer (HR, 4.530; 95% CI, 2.251-9.115; P<0.001]. In conclusion, the efficacy of systemic antitumor therapy in young patients was poorer compared with that in elderly patients. Young patients with liver cancer had a high HBV infection rate and were prone to HPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.