Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988382›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Detection of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers changes of Alzheimer's disease using a cognitive stress test in persons with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment.

Maria Valles-Salgado, María José Gil-Moreno, Rosie E Curiel Cid, Alfonso Delgado-Álvarez, Isabel Ortega-Madueño, Cristina Delgado-Alonso, Marta Palacios-Sarmiento, Juan I López-Carbonero, María Cruz Cárdenas, Jorge Matías-Guiu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cognitive dysfunction in women with theJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maria Valles-SalgadoDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
María José Gil-MorenoDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rosie E Curiel CidCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience and Aging, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Alfonso Delgado-ÁlvarezDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Isabel Ortega-MadueñoDepartment of Clinical Analysis, Institute of Laboratory, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Delgado-AlonsoDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Palacios-SarmientoDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Juan I López-CarboneroDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
María Cruz CárdenasDepartment of Clinical Analysis, Institute of Laboratory, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Matías-GuiuDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
María Díez-CirardaDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
David A LoewensteinCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience and Aging, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Jordi A Matias-GuiuDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Timely and accurate diagnosis of the earliest manifestations of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critically important. Cognitive challenge tests such as the Loewenstein Acevedo Scales for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L) have shown favorable diagnostic properties in a number of previous investigations using amyloid or FDG PET. However, no studies have examined LASSI-L performance against cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of AD, which can be affected before the distribution of fibrillar amyloid and other changes that can be observed in brain neuroimaging. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between LASSI-L scores and CSF biomarkers and the capacity of the cognitive challenge test to detect the presence of amyloid and tau deposition in patients with subjective cognitive decline and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: One hundred and seventy-nine patients consulting for memory loss without functional impairment were enrolled. Patients were examined using comprehensive neuropsychological assessment, the LASSI-L, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers (Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 and ptau181). Means comparisons, correlations, effect sizes, and ROC curves were calculated. Results: LASSI-L scores were significantly associated with CSF biomarkers Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 in patients diagnosed with MCI and subjective cognitive decline, especially those scores evaluating the capacity to recover from proactive semantic interference effects and delayed recall. A logistic regression model for the entire sample including LASSI-L and age showed an accuracy of 0.749 and an area under the curve of 0.785 to detect abnormal amyloid deposition. Conclusion: Our study supports the biological validity of the LASSI-L and its semantic interference paradigm in the context of the early stages of AD. These findings emphasize the utility and the convenience of including sensitive cognitive challenge tests in the assessment of patients with suspicion of early stages of AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasecerebrospinal fluid biomarkersmemorymild cognitive impairmentneuropsychological assessmentsemantic interference

Identifiers

PMID38988382
PMCPMC11233766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.