Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988337›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2023

EASL: A Framework for Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating ML Solutions in Clinical Healthcare Settings.

Eric Prince, Todd C Hankinson, Carsten Görg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Visual Analytics Framework for Assessing Interactive AI for Clinical Decision Support.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The Iterative Design Process of an Explainable AI Application for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of CNS Tumors: A User-Centered Approach.... IEEE Workshop on Visual Analytics in Healthcare. IEEE Workshop on Visual Analytics in Healthcare · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric PrinceComputational Bioscience Program, Morgan Adams Foundation for Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Todd C HankinsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Morgan Adams Foundation for Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Carsten GörgDepartment of Biostatistics & Informatics, Morgan Adams Foundation for Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Funding

Computational Bioscience Program Training GrantT15LM009451 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katherina Kechris-Mays, Arjun Krishnan · 2007 to 2026
$11.7M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002533 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI CICUTTO, LISA · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
Human-centered design of clinical AI to support the diagnosis of pediatric suprasellar tumorsF31CA275272 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PRINCE, ERIC W · 2023 to 2024
$74k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002533NCI NIH HHS F31 CA275272NLM NIH HHS T15 LM009451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce the Explainable Analytical Systems Lab (EASL) framework, an end-to-end solution designed to facilitate the development, implementation, and evaluation of clinical machine learning (ML) tools. EASL is highly versatile and applicable to a variety of contexts and includes resources for data management, ML model development, visualization and user interface development, service hosting, and usage analytics. To demonstrate its practical applications, we present the EASL framework in the context of a case study: designing and evaluating a deep learning classifier to predict diagnoses from medical imaging. The framework is composed of three modules, each with their own set of resources. The Workbench module stores data and develops initial ML models, the Canvas module contains a medical imaging viewer and web development framework, and the Studio module hosts the ML model and provides web analytics and support for conducting user studies. EASL encourages model developers to take a holistic view by integrating the model development, implementation, and evaluation into one framework, and thus ensures that models are both effective and reliable when used in a clinical setting. EASL contributes to our understanding of machine learning applied to healthcare by providing a comprehensive framework that makes it easier to develop and evaluate ML tools within a clinical setting.

Identifiers

PMID38988337
PMCPMC11235083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.