ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2024
De novo synthetic antimicrobial peptide design with a recurrent neural network.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Efficacy and safety evaluation of artificial intelligence-identified antimicrobial peptides targeting avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in broiler chickens.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Target Discovery in ESKAPE Pathogens: An AI-Driven Framework from Omics-Based to Systems-Level Modeling and Clinical Translation.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in deep learning for antimicrobial research.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Uncloaking the black-box: the need for explainable artificial intelligence in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases applications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Antibacterial Drug Discovery: Deep Learning Successes and Challenges through the Structural Biology Lens.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- BERT-AmPEP60: A BERT-Based Transfer Learning Approach to Predict the Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations of Antimicrobial Peptides forJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- De novo synthetic antimicrobial peptide design with a recurrent neural network.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance is recognized as an imminent and growing global health threat. New antimicrobial drugs are urgently needed due to the decreasing effectiveness of conventional small-molecule antibiotics. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), a class of host defense peptides, are emerging as promising candidates to address this need. The potential sequence space of amino acids is combinatorially vast, making it possible to extend the current arsenal of antimicrobial agents with a practically infinite number of new peptide-based candidates. However, mining naturally occurring AMPs, whether directly by wet lab screening methods or aided by bioinformatics prediction tools, has its theoretical limit regarding the number of samples or genomic/transcriptomic resources researchers have access to. Further, manually designing novel synthetic AMPs requires prior field knowledge, restricting its throughput. In silico sequence generation methods are gaining interest as a high-throughput solution to the problem. Here, we introduce AMPd-Up, a recurrent neural network based tool for de novo AMP design, and demonstrate its utility over existing methods. Validation of candidates designed by AMPd-Up through antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed that 40 of the 58 generated sequences possessed antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli and/or Staphylococcus aureus. These results illustrate that AMPd-Up can be used to design novel synthetic AMPs with potent activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.