Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988256›Full record

Observational studyEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024

Efficacy and safety of focal pulsed-field ablation for ventricular arrhythmias: two-centre experience.

Petr Peichl, Alan Bulava, Dan Wichterle, Filip Schlosser, Predrag Stojadinović, Eva Borišincová, Peter Štiavnický, Jana Hašková, Josef Kautzner

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Ventricular pulsed field ablation from bench to bedside: preclinical and clinical evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pulsed field ablation for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation: a scientific statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Guideline
  4. The future of PFA in cardiac ablation procedures.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Focal pulsed field ablation for complex ventricular arrhythmias after prior failed or intraprocedurally ineffective radiofrequency ablation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  8. Pulsed field ablation for idiopathic premature ventricular complexes: evaluation of acute and chronic lesion characteristics with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Latest Advances and Ongoing Challenges in Pulsed Field Ablation.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026
    Review
  14. Pulsed field ablation of ventricular arrhythmias arising from intracavitary structures: insights from a clinical case series.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Coronary vasospasm during pulsed field focal ventricular ablation with solid tip catheter.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Safety and efficacy of a lattice-tip catheter for ventricular arrhythmia ablation: the AFFERA Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation Registry (AVAAR).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Epicardial ventricular arrhythmia ablation: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology and the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asian Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Petr PeichlDepartment of Cardiology, IKEM, Vídeňská 1958/9, Praha 4, Prague 140 21, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-5625-0071
Alan BulavaČeské Budějovice Hospital and Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, České Budějovice, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-1742-207X
Dan WichterleDepartment of Cardiology, IKEM, Vídeňská 1958/9, Praha 4, Prague 140 21, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-0448-5143
Filip SchlosserDepartment of Cardiology, IKEM, Vídeňská 1958/9, Praha 4, Prague 140 21, Czechia.ORCID 0009-0002-5106-4314
Predrag StojadinovićDepartment of Cardiology, IKEM, Vídeňská 1958/9, Praha 4, Prague 140 21, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-1487-5823
Eva BorišincováDepartment of Cardiology, IKEM, Vídeňská 1958/9, Praha 4, Prague 140 21, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-9756-283X
Peter ŠtiavnickýDepartment of Cardiology, IKEM, Vídeňská 1958/9, Praha 4, Prague 140 21, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0001-6063-3545
Jana HaškováDepartment of Cardiology, IKEM, Vídeňská 1958/9, Praha 4, Prague 140 21, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0003-3774-8672
Josef KautznerDepartment of Cardiology, IKEM, Vídeňská 1958/9, Praha 4, Prague 140 21, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-1632-6182

Funding

European UnionIKEMMinistry of Health 00023001National Institute for Metabolic and Cardiovascular Research LX22NPO5104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsA pulsed electric field (PF) energy source is a novel potential option for catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) as it can create deeper lesions, particularly in scarred tissue. However, very limited data exist on its efficacy and safety. This prospective observational study reports the initial experience with VA ablation using focal PF. METHODS AND

resultsThe study population consisted of 44 patients (16 women, aged 61 ± 14years) with either frequent ventricular premature complexes (VPCs, 48%) or scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT, 52%). Ablation was performed using an irrigated 4 mm tip catheter and a commercially available PF generator. On average, 16 ± 15 PF applications (25 A) were delivered per patient. Acute success was achieved in 84% of patients as assessed by elimination of VPC or reaching non-inducibility of VT. In three cases (7%), a transient conduction system block was observed during PF applications remotely from the septum. Root analysis revealed that this event was caused by current leakage from the proximal shaft electrodes in contact with the basal interventricular septum. Acute elimination of VPC was achieved in 81% patients and non-inducibility of VT in 83% patients. At the 3-month follow-up, persistent suppression of the VPC was confirmed on Holter monitoring in 81% patients. In the VT group, the mean follow-up was 116 ± 75 days and a total of 52% patients remained free of any VA.

conclusionPulsed electric field catheter ablation of a broad spectrum of VA is feasible with acute high efficacy; however, the short-term follow-up is less satisfactory for patients with scar-related VT.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationTachycardia, VentricularVentricular Premature ComplexesAgedCicatrixElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCatheter ablationPulsed-field energyVentricular premature complexesVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID38988256
PMCPMC11264298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.