Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988210›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2024

A Shared-Frailty Spatial Scan Statistic Model for Time-to-Event Data.

Camille Frévent, Mohamed-Salem Ahmed, Sophie Dabo-Niang, Michaël Genin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camille FréventUniversité de Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Université de Lille, Lille, France.
Mohamed-Salem AhmedUniversité de Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Université de Lille, Lille, France.
Sophie Dabo-NiangCNRS, UMR 8524 - Laboratoire Paul Painlevé, Université de Lille, Lille, France.
Michaël GeninUniversité de Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Université de Lille, Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial scan statistics are well-known methods widely used to detect spatial clusters of events. Furthermore, several spatial scan statistics models have been applied to the spatial analysis of time-to-event data. However, these models do not take account of potential correlations between the observations of individuals within the same spatial unit or potential spatial dependence between spatial units. To overcome this problem, we have developed a scan statistic based on a Cox model with shared frailty and that takes account of the spatial dependence between spatial units. In simulation studies, we found that (i) conventional models of spatial scan statistics for time-to-event data fail to maintain the type I error in the presence of a correlation between the observations of individuals within the same spatial unit and (ii) our model performed well in the presence of such correlation and spatial dependence. We have applied our method to epidemiological data and the detection of spatial clusters of mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease in northern France.

Indexed as

BiometryModels, StatisticalFrailtyHumansKidney Failure, ChronicProportional Hazards ModelsSpatial AnalysisTime Factorsconditional autoregressive modelshared frailty modelspatial scan statisticstime‐to‐event data

Identifiers

PMID38988210
PMCPMC12859540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.