Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988197›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2024

D2 dopamine receptor expression, reactivity to rewards, and reinforcement learning in a complex value-based decision-making task.

Cristina Banuelos, Kasey Creswell, Catherine Walsh, Stephen B Manuck, Peter J Gianaros, Timothy Verstynen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristina BanuelosDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3090-8058
Kasey CreswellDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6659-0651
Catherine WalshDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.
Stephen B ManuckDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.
Peter J GianarosDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2313-5277
Timothy VerstynenDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.

Funding

Substrates of Threat and Reward Sensitivity and CVD RiskP01HL040962 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ERICKSON, KIRK I · 1988 to 2022
$31.1M
TRAINING PROGRAM FOR MD/PHD STUDENTST32GM008208 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STEINMAN, RICHARD A · 1987 to 2021
$15.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL040962NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008208NIH HHS P01HL040962 R01089850 T32GM008208-29
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different dopamine (DA) subtypes have opposing dynamics at postsynaptic receptors, with the ratio of D1 to D2 receptors determining the relative sensitivity to gains and losses, respectively, during value-based learning. This effective sensitivity to different reward feedback interacts with phasic DA levels to determine the effectiveness of learning, particularly in dynamic feedback situations where the frequency and magnitude of rewards need to be integrated over time to make optimal decisions. We modeled this effect in simulations of the underlying basal ganglia pathways and then tested the predictions in individuals with a variant of the human dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2; -141C Ins/Del and Del/Del) gene that associates with lower levels of D2 receptor expression (N = 119) and compared their performance in the Iowa Gambling Task to noncarrier controls (N = 319). Ventral striatal (VS) reactivity to rewards was measured in the Cards task with fMRI. DRD2 variant carriers made less effective decisions than noncarriers, but this effect was not moderated by VS reward reactivity as is hypothesized by our model. These results suggest that the interaction between DA receptor subtypes and reactivity to rewards during learning may be more complex than originally thought.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMagnetic Resonance ImagingReceptors, Dopamine D2Reinforcement, PsychologyRewardAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDRD2 protein, humanReceptors, Dopamine D2basal gangliadecision makingdopamineDRD2reinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID38988197
PMCPMC11281849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.