Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38988158›Full record

ReviewCurrent cancer drug targets2025

Transforming Cancer Care: The Impact of AI-driven Strategies.

Debanjan Mukherjee, Debajyoti Roy, Shubham Thakur

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cancer drug targets, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Debanjan MukherjeeDepartment of Quality Assurance, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, Punjab, 142001, India.
Debajyoti RoyDepartment of Pharmacognosy, C.V. Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar, 752054, Odisha, India.
Shubham ThakurDepartment of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, Punjab, 142001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AI is a critical component in healthcare, especially in the application of precision medicine where patients' characteristics, including genetic makeup, determine the treatment options that should be implemented. AI sorts big data, predicting people's reactions to specific treatments, the right combinations of drugs, and possible side effects, therefore increasing the efficiency of the treatment process and decreasing negative outcomes. This article briefly presents the ethical issues and concerns that might arise due to the integration of AI in society, such as the privacy of data, the issues of bias in the algorithms, and the issues of interpretability of the AI systems. Nevertheless, there is no doubt that AI can bring qualitative changes in cancer care based on its potential to enhance patient prognosis and reduce health care costs, as well as become a defining feature of the standard of care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineDelivery of Health CareHumansalgorithmic bias.Artificial intelligencecancer caremedical imagingpersonalized medicinetreatment optimization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.