ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
A rare partnership: patient community and industry collaboration to shape the impact of real-world evidence on the rare disease ecosystem.
Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging trends and research hot spots in inborn error of immunity: A bibliometric perspective.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Extracting homogenous data from heterogenous diseases: RaraSwed, the Swedish national rare disease quality registry.BMC global and public health · 2026Review
- The Double-Edged Role of Social Media in Modern Healthcare: Awareness, Impact, and Misinformation.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence, Connected Care, and Enabling Digital Health Technologies in Rare Diseases With a Focus on Lysosomal Storage Disorders: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The Digital Diagnostic Odyssey: Artificial Intelligence and Social Media Crowdsourcing Amid Pediatric Neurology Access Gaps.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2026Article
- A practical framework to approach the development and evaluation of patient registries for rare diseases.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Review
- Pompe Disease: A Review of Diagnosis, Molecular Genetics, and Treatment Management.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Review
- "We are ambassadors, we are advocates": rare disease patient advocacy groups as knowledge brokers across health and social systems-a qualitative study from Poland.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Reshaping the hierarchical medical system for rare diseases: a two-tier structure and one-stop referral network.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Real-world evidence for Pompe disease remains fragmented. Comment on "A rare partnership: patient community and industry collaboration to shape the impact of real-world evidence on the rare disease ecosystem" by Klein et al.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Highlights of Precision Medicine, Genetics, Epigenetics and Artificial Intelligence in Pompe Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Who presents the greatest challenge in intellectual disability research- participants or health and research professionals?PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with rare lysosomal storage diseases face challenges in their care that arise from disease complexity and heterogeneity, compounded by many healthcare professionals being unfamiliar with these diseases. These challenges can result in long diagnostic journeys and inadequate care. Over 30 years ago, the Rare Disease Registries for Gaucher, Fabry, Mucopolysaccharidosis type I and Pompe diseases were established to address knowledge gaps in disease natural history, clinical manifestations of disease and treatment outcomes. Evidence generated from the real-world data collected in these registries supports multiple stakeholders, including patients, healthcare providers, drug developers, researchers and regulators. To maximise the impact of real-world evidence from these registries, engagement and collaboration with the patient communities is essential. To this end, the Rare Disease Registries Patient Council was established in 2019 as a partnership between the Rare Disease Registries and global and local patient advocacy groups to share perspectives on how registry data are used and disseminated. The Patient Council has resulted in a number of patient initiatives including patient representation at Rare Disease Registries advisory boards; development of plain language summaries of registry publications to increase availability of real-world evidence to patient communities; and implementation of digital innovations such as electronic patient-reported outcomes, and patient-facing registry reports and electronic consent (in development), all to enhance patient engagement. The Patient Council is building on the foundations of industry-patient advocacy group collaboration to fully integrate patient communities in decision-making and co-create solutions for the rare disease community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.