Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987819›Full record

ReviewHuman genomics2024

Pharmacogenetics in Italy: current landscape and future prospects.

Matteo Floris, Antonino Moschella, Myriam Alcalay, Annalaura Montella, Matilde Tirelli, Laura Fontana, Maria Laura Idda, Pharmacogenomics Working Group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), Paolo Guarnieri, Mario Capasso and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Complete Picture of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Matteo Floris *Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy. matteo.floris@gmail.com.
Antonino Moschella *Unit of Medical Genetics, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Myriam AlcalayDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Annalaura MontellaCEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate, Napoli, Italy.
Matilde TirelliCEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate, Napoli, Italy.
Laura FontanaMedical Genetics Unit, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Maria Laura IddaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Pharmacogenomics Working Group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU)
Paolo Guarnieri23andMe Inc., Therapeutics, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mario CapassoCEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate, Napoli, Italy.
Corrado MammìUnit of Medical Genetics, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Paola NicolettiDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Monica MiozzoMedical Genetics Unit, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. monica.miozzo@unimi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacogenetics investigates sequence of genes that affect drug response, enabling personalized medication. This approach reduces drug-induced adverse reactions and improves clinical effectiveness, making it a crucial consideration for personalized medical care. Numerous guidelines, drawn by global consortia and scientific organizations, codify genotype-driven administration for over 120 active substances. As the scientific community acknowledges the benefits of genotype-tailored therapy over traditionally agnostic drug administration, the push for its implementation into Italian healthcare system is gaining momentum. This evolution is influenced by several factors, including the improved access to patient genotypes, the sequencing costs decrease, the growing of large-scale genetic studies, the rising popularity of direct-to-consumer pharmacogenetic tests, and the continuous improvement of pharmacogenetic guidelines. Since EMA (European Medicines Agency) and AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency) provide genotype information on drug leaflet without clear and explicit clinical indications for gene testing, the regulation of pharmacogenetic testing is a pressing matter in Italy. In this manuscript, we have reviewed how to overcome the obstacles in implementing pharmacogenetic testing in the clinical practice of the Italian healthcare system. Our particular emphasis has been on germline testing, given the absence of well-defined national directives in contrast to somatic pharmacogenetics.

Indexed as

PharmacogeneticsGenotypeHumansItalyPharmacogenomic TestingPrecision MedicineGermline testingPharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID38987819
PMCPMC11234611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.