Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987813›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2024

CSF formation rate-a potential glymphatic flow parameter in hydrocephalus?

Sara Qvarlander, Nina Sundström, Jan Malm, Anders Eklund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quantitative assessment of flow between cerebrospinal and interstitial fluid compartments in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Fluid dynamics model of the cerebral ventricular system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara QvarlanderDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. sara.qvarlander@umu.se.
Nina SundströmDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Jan MalmDepartment of Clinical Science, Neurosciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Anders EklundDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning RMX18-0152Vetenskapsrådet 2021-00711_VR/JPND
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies indicate that brain clearance via the glymphatic system is impaired in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH). This has been suggested to result from reduced cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) turnover, which could be caused by a reduced CSF formation rate. The aim of this study was to determine the formation rate of CSF in a cohort of patients investigated for INPH and compare this to a historical control cohort.

methodsCSF formation rate was estimated in 135 (75 ± 6 years old, 64/71 men/women) patients undergoing investigation for INPH. A semiautomatic CSF infusion investigation (via lumbar puncture) was performed. CSF formation rate was assessed by downregulating and steadily maintaining CSF pressure at a zero level. During the last 10 min, the required outflow to maintain zero pressure, i.e., CSF formation rate, was continuously measured. The values were compared to those of a historical reference cohort from a study by Ekstedt in 1978.

resultsMean CSF formation rate was 0.45 ± 0.15 ml/min (N = 135), equivalent to 27 ± 9 ml/hour. There was no difference in the mean (p = 0.362) or variance (p = 0.498) of CSF formation rate between the subjects that were diagnosed as INPH (N = 86) and those who were not (N = 43). The CSF formation rate in INPH was statistically higher than in the reference cohort (0.46 ± 0.15 vs. 0.40 ± 0.08 ml/min, p = 0.005), but the small difference was probably not physiologically relevant. There was no correlation between CSF formation rate and baseline CSF pressure (r = 0.136, p = 0.115, N = 135) or age (-0.02, p = 0.803, N = 135).

conclusionsThe average CSF formation rate in INPH was not decreased compared to the healthy reference cohort, which does not support reduced CSF turnover. This emphasizes the need to further investigate the source and routes of the flow in the glymphatic system and the cause of the suggested impaired glymphatic clearance in INPH.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal FluidGlymphatic SystemHydrocephalus, Normal PressureAgedAged, 80 and overCerebrospinal Fluid PressureCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpinal PunctureCSF dynamicsCSF productionGlymphatic systemIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Identifiers

PMID38987813
PMCPMC11234690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.