ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Patent conversion of a novel closed chest drainage device.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery after neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Design optimization and clinical prospects of a novel portable split-type negative pressure thoracic drainage device.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A novel closed chest drainage device.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Closed chest drainage is typically necessary following Lobar and Sublobar resections to evacuate gases and fluids from the thoracic cavity, eliminate residual pleural space for lung expansion, and maintain negative pressure. Currently, three conventional closed chest drainage systems are commonly employed: single-chamber, double-chamber, and triple-chamber systems; each system has its own advantages and disadvantages. Despite the emergence of digital drainage systems in recent years, their high cost hinders their widespread adoption. Based on this premise, our research team has achieved a patent for a micro air pump-integrated chest closed drainage bottle, which has been further developed into a novel device integrating a three-chamber system with negative pressure control and power supply capabilities. This device enables patients undergoing perioperative lung procedures to ambulate freely while simultaneously receiving chest suction therapy-a concept that theoretically promotes rapid postoperative recovery. Moreover, this device offers economic benefits and holds potential for clinical implementation (particularly in economically underdeveloped regions). In this article, we modified the thoracic closed drainage device based on our patent and presented this novel thoracic closed drainage device after 3D printing and assembly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.