Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987803›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical education2024

Evaluating the effects of comprehensive simulation on central venous catheterization training: a comparative observational study.

Haroula M Tzamaras, Dailen Brown, Jessica Gonzalez-Vargas, Jason Moore, Scarlett R Miller

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haroula M TzamarasDepartment of Industrial Engineering, 307 Engineering Design and Innovation Building, Penn State, University Park, 16801, USA.
Dailen BrownDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Penn State, University Park, USA.
Jessica Gonzalez-VargasDepartment of Industrial Engineering, 307 Engineering Design and Innovation Building, Penn State, University Park, 16801, USA.
Jason MooreDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Penn State, University Park, USA.
Scarlett R MillerDepartment of Industrial Engineering, 307 Engineering Design and Innovation Building, Penn State, University Park, 16801, USA. shm13@psu.edu.

Funding

Dynamic Haptic Robotic Training for Central Venous Catheter InsertionR01HL127316 · NHLBI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI Scarlett Miller, Jason Zachary Moore · 2015 to 2026
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulation-based training (SBT) is vital to complex medical procedures such as ultrasound guided central venous catheterization (US-IJCVC), where the experience level of the physician impacts the likelihood of incurring complications. The Dynamic Haptic Robotic Trainer (DHRT) was developed to train residents in CVC as an improvement over manikin trainers, however, the DHRT and manikin trainer both only provide training on one specific portion of CVC, needle insertion. As such, CVC SBT would benefit from more comprehensive training. An extended version of the DHRT was created, the DHRT + , to provide hands-on training and automated feedback on additional steps of CVC. The DHRT + includes a full CVC medical kit, a false vein channel, and a personalized, reactive interface. When used together, the DHRT and DHRT + systems provide comprehensive training on needle insertion and catheter placement for CVC. This study evaluates the impact of the DHRT + on resident self-efficacy and CVC skill gains as compared to training on the DHRT alone.

methodsForty-seven medical residents completed training on the DHRT and 59 residents received comprehensive training on the DHRT and the DHRT + . Each resident filled out a central line self-efficacy (CLSE) survey before and after undergoing training on the simulators. After simulation training, each resident did one full CVC on a manikin while being observed by an expert rater and graded on a US-IJCVC checklist.

resultsFor two items on the US-IJCVC checklist, "verbalizing consent" and "aspirating blood through the catheter", the DHRT + group performed significantly better than the DHRT only group. Both training groups showed significant improvements in self-efficacy from before to after training. However, type of training received was a significant predictor for CLSE items "using the proper equipment in the proper order", and "securing the catheter with suture and applying dressing" with the comprehensive training group that received additional training on the DHRT + showing higher post training self-efficacy.

conclusionsThe integration of comprehensive training into SBT has the potential to improve US-IJCVC education for both learning gains and self-efficacy.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousClinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyManikinsSimulation TrainingEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansMaleSelf EfficacyUltrasonography, InterventionalCentral venous catheterizationComprehensive simulationMedical simulation

Identifiers

PMID38987803
PMCPMC11234713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.