Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987797›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2024

The construction of machine learning-based predictive models for high-quality embryo formation in poor ovarian response patients with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation.

Yu-Heng Xiao, Yu-Lin Hu, Xing-Yu Lv, Li-Juan Huang, Li-Hong Geng, Pu Liao, Yu-Bin Ding, Chang-Chun Niu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Progress in the application of artificial intelligence in assisted reproduction].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu-Heng Xiao *Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Yu-Lin Hu *The Reproductive Center, Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women and Children's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610011, China.
Xing-Yu LvThe Reproductive Center, Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women and Children's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610011, China.
Li-Juan HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401147, China.
Li-Hong GengThe Reproductive Center, Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women and Children's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610011, China.
Pu LiaoChongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China. liaopu@sina.com.
Yu-Bin DingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401147, China. dingyb@cqmu.edu.cn.
Chang-Chun NiuChongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China. bright_star2000@sina.com.

Funding

Chongqing Health Commission and Science and Technology Bureau No. 2024MSXM105National Key Research and Development Program of China No. 2023YFC2705900Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality of China CSTB2022NSCQ-LZX0062Open Fund of Chongqing Maternal and Child Disease Control and Public Health Research Center CQFYSJ01001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the optimal models for predicting the formation of high-quality embryos in Poor Ovarian Response (POR) Patients with Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) using machine learning algorithms.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 4,216 POR cycles who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) / intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women and Children's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021. Based on the presence of high-quality cleavage embryos 72 h post-fertilization, the samples were divided into the high-quality cleavage embryo group (N = 1950) and the non-high-quality cleavage embryo group (N = 2266). Additionally, based on whether high-quality blastocysts were observed following full blastocyst culture, the samples were categorized into the high-quality blastocyst group (N = 124) and the non-high-quality blastocyst group (N = 1800). The factors influencing the formation of high-quality embryos were analyzed using logistic regression. The predictive models based on machine learning methods were constructed and evaluated accordingly.

resultsDifferential analysis revealed that there are statistically significant differences in 14 factors between high-quality and non-high-quality cleavage embryos. Logistic regression analysis identified 14 factors as influential in forming high-quality cleavage embryos. In models excluding three variables (retrieved oocytes, MII oocytes, and 2PN fertilized oocytes), the XGBoost model performed slightly better (AUC = 0.672, 95% CI = 0.636-0.708). Conversely, in models including these three variables, the Random Forest model exhibited the best performance (AUC = 0.788, 95% CI = 0.759-0.818). In the analysis of high-quality blastocysts, significant differences were found in 17 factors. Logistic regression analysis indicated that 13 factors influence the formation of high-quality blastocysts. Including these variables in the predictive model, the XGBoost model showed the highest performance (AUC = 0.813, 95% CI = 0.741-0.884).

conclusionWe developed a predictive model for the formation of high-quality embryos using machine learning methods for patients with POR undergoing treatment with the PPOS protocol. This model can help infertility patients better understand the likelihood of forming high-quality embryos following treatment and help clinicians better understand and predict treatment outcomes, thus facilitating more targeted and effective interventions.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOvulation InductionProgestinsAdultBlastocystEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicProgestinsHigh-quality embryoMachine learningPoor ovarian responseProgestin-primed ovarian stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38987797
PMCPMC11234746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.