Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987693›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

PET-CT-guided, symptom-based, patient-initiated surveillance versus clinical follow-up in head neck cancer patients (PETNECK2): study protocol for a multicentre feasibility study and non-inferiority, randomised, phase III trial.

Paul Nankivell, Piers Gaunt, Claire Gaunt, Julia Sissons, Evaggelia Liaskou, Yolande Jefferson, Tessa Fulton-Lieuw, Saloni Mittal, Hisham Mehanna, PETNECK2 Research Team

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A cross-sectional retrospective and prospective service evaluation of head and neck cancer patients' swallowing and quality of life concerns: are we doing enough?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Surveillance after treatment for head and neck cancer.Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paul NankivellInstitute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. p.c.nankivell@bham.ac.uk.
Piers GauntCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham. B15 2TT, UK.
Claire GauntCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham. B15 2TT, UK.
Julia SissonsCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham. B15 2TT, UK.
Evaggelia LiaskouCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham. B15 2TT, UK.
Yolande JeffersonCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham. B15 2TT, UK.
Tessa Fulton-LieuwInstitute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Saloni MittalInstitute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Hisham MehannaInstitute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
PETNECK2 Research Team

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR200861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 40% of treated head and neck cancer (HNC) patients develop recurrence. The risk of recurrence declines with time from treatment. Current guidelines recommend clinical follow-up every two months for the first two years after treatment, with reducing intensity over the next three years. However, evidence for the effectiveness of these regimes in detecting recurrence is lacking, with calls for more flexible, patient-centred follow-up strategies.

methodsPETNECK2 is a UK-based multi-centre programme examining a new paradigm of follow-up, using positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT)-guided, symptom-based, patient-initiated surveillance. This paradigm is being tested in a unblinded, non-inferiority, phase III, randomised controlled trial (RCT). Patients with HNC, one year after completing curative intent treatment, with no clinical symptoms or signs of loco-regional or distant metastasis will be randomised using a 1:1 allocation ratio to either regular scheduled follow-up, or to PET-CT guided, patient-initiated follow-up. Patients at a low risk of recurrence (negative PET-CT) will receive a face-to-face education session along with an Information and Support (I&S) resource package to monitor symptoms and be in control of initiating an urgent appointment when required. The primary outcome of the RCT is overall survival. The RCT also has an in-built pilot, a nested QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI), and a nested mixed-methods study on patient experience and fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). An initial, single-arm feasibility study has been completed which determined the acceptability of the patient-initiated surveillance intervention, the completion rates of baseline questionnaires, and optimised the I&S resource prior to implementation in the RCT. DISCUSSION: We hypothesise that combining an additional 12-month post-treatment PET-CT scan and I&S resource will both identify patients with asymptomatic recurrence and identify those at low risk of future recurrence who will be empowered to monitor their symptoms and seek early clinical follow-up when recurrence is suspected. This change to a patient-centred model of care may have effects on both quality of life and fear of cancer recurrence.

trial registrationISRCTN: 13,709,798; 15-Oct-2021.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicUnited KingdomFeasibility studyHead and neck cancerPatient-initiated follow-upPhase III randomised clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID38987693
PMCPMC11234619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.