ArticleScientific data2024
Dataset of the rumen microbiota and epithelial transcriptomics and proteomics in goat affected by solid diets.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Partial Replacement of Alfalfa Hay with Alfalfa Silage in Dairy Cows: Impacts on Production Performance and Rumen Microbiota.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Bacterial-Fungal Interactions: Mutualism, Antagonism, and Competition.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Transcriptomics data for muscle development in Goats.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Chestnut tannins impair ruminal fiber degradation through modulation of cellulolytic bacterial activity in sheep: an in vivo and in vitro investigation.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic characterization of the functional and morphological development of the rumen wall in weaned lambs fed a diet containing yeast co-cultures ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although early solid diet supplementation is a common practice to improve the growth and development in goat kids, its biological mechanism how solid diet induces rumen microbiota and epithelial development is still unknow. In this study, rumen fermentation parameters, 16S rRNA sequencing for rumen content and epithelial microbiota, transcriptomics and proteomics of epithelium were determined to classify the effects of solid diet supplementation. Here, we classified the changes of goat phenotypes (i.e., growth performance, rumen fermentation and development) and linked them to the changes of rumen microbiota, transcriptome and expressed proteins. The mechanism of solid diet improving rumen development was elucidated preliminarily. Moreover, different roles between the rumen content and epithelial microbiota were identified. Thess datasets expands our understanding of the association between the early diet intervention and rumen development, providing the useful information how nutrient strategy affects rumen function and subsequently improves the host growth. The generated data provides insights in the importance of rumen niche microbiota and microbe-host interactions, which benefits future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.