Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987505›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2024

Drug utilization pattern of romosozumab and other osteoporosis treatments in Japan, 2019-2021.

Satoshi Soen, Alex Wang, Etsuro Hamaya, Hsu-Chih Chien, Tzu-Chieh Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Treatment patterns of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis in Denmark: findings from the ROmosozumab in Scandinavia real-world Evidence Study (ROSES).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Satoshi SoenSoen Orthopedics, Osteoporosis, and Rheumatology Clinic, 2-14-10 Okamoto, Higashinada-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 658-0072, Japan. nra48207@nifty.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0955-2747
Alex WangMedical Development, Amgen Inc, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3656-4284
Etsuro HamayaMedical Affairs, Amgen K.K, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0717-8545
Hsu-Chih ChienCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6472-5794
Tzu-Chieh LinCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8333-7666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDescribe real-world treatment of osteoporosis and romosozumab treatment patterns in Japan. MATERIALS AND

methodsData for patients initiating romosozumab or other antiosteoporotic medications between March 01, 2018, and May 31, 2022, were extracted from the Medical Data Vision (MDV) and Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) databases. Patients were categorized into four cohorts: those who newly initiated romosozumab within the first (MDV: n = 4782; JMDC: n = 2578) or second (MDV: n = 3888; JMDC: n = 2446) year after launch and those who initiated teriparatide (TPTD; MDV: n = 14,576; JMDC: n = 8259) or non-TPTD antiosteoporotic medications within the first year of romosozumab launch (MDV: n = 352,142; JMDC: n = 185,785).

resultsMean age, sex, baseline cardiovascular history, comorbidities, and concomitant medications were similar across cohorts. In the MDV database, fracture history was higher in the romosozumab year-1 (59.3%), year-2 (64.1%), and TPTD (65.5%) cohorts versus the non-TPTD cohort (24.4%). Similar rates were identified in the JMDC database: romosozumab year-1 (64.7%), year-2 (66.6%), TPTD (67.5%), and non-TPTD (27.8%). Vertebral fractures were most common in all cohorts. 12-month romosozumab discontinuation varied between the year-1 and year-2 cohorts in MDV (62.4% and 58.8%) and JMDC (57.1% and 52.7%), whereas mean number of injections remained consistent (MDV: 9.7 and 9.8; JMDC: 7.3 and 7.8). Romosozumab persistence was lower in year-1 versus year-2 (MDV: 37.6% and 42.9%; JMDC: 41.2% and 47.3%).

conclusionPatients initiating romosozumab and TPTD had a high fracture history. Given the dual effects of promoting bone formation and suppressing resorption, improving romosozumab adherence and persistence over time may be important for antiosteoporotic therapy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalOsteoporosisAgedAged, 80 and overBone Density Conservation AgentsDatabases, FactualDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedTeriparatideAntibodies, MonoclonalBone Density Conservation AgentsromosozumabTeriparatideComorbidityJapanOsteoporosisOsteoporotic fractureRomosozumab

Identifiers

PMID38987505
PMCPMC11631996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.