Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987476›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Computational Methods to Target Protein-Protein Interactions.

Michał K Jastrzębski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michał K JastrzębskiDepartment of Synthesis and Chemical Technology of Pharmaceutical Substances with Computer Modeling Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. michal.jastrzebski@umlub.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chapter emphasizes the importance of understanding protein-protein interactions in cellular mechanisms and highlights the role of computational modeling in predicting these interactions. It discusses sequence-based approaches such as evolutionary trace (ET), correlated mutation analysis (CMA), and subtractive correlated mutation (SCM) for identifying crucial amino acid residues, considering interface conservation or evolutionary changes. The chapter also explores methods like differential ET, hidden-site class model, and spatial cluster detection (SCD) for interface specificity and spatial clustering. Furthermore, it examines approaches combining structural and sequential methodologies and evaluates modeled predictions through initiatives like critical assessment of prediction of interactions (CAPRI). Additionally, the chapter provides an overview of various software programs used for molecular docking, detailing their search, sampling, refinement and scoring stages, along with innovative techniques and tools like normal mode analysis (NMA) and adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann solver (APBS) for electrostatic calculations. These computational and experimental approaches are crucial for unraveling protein-protein interactions and aid in developing potential therapeutics for various diseases.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProteinsSoftwareAlgorithmsHumansMutationProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MappingProteinsProtein-protein dockingSequence-based methodsStructure-based methods

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.