Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987466›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Machine Learning Methods in Protein-Protein Docking.

Ilona Michalik, Kamil J Kuder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ilona MichalikDepartment of Technology and Biotechnology of Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Kamil J KuderDepartment of Technology and Biotechnology of Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland. kamil.kuder@uj.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An exponential increase in the number of publications that address artificial intelligence (AI) usage in life sciences has been noticed in recent years, while new modeling techniques are constantly being reported. The potential of these methods is vast-from understanding fundamental cellular processes to discovering new drugs and breakthrough therapies. Computational studies of protein-protein interactions, crucial for understanding the operation of biological systems, are no exception in this field. However, despite the rapid development of technology and the progress in developing new approaches, many aspects remain challenging to solve, such as predicting conformational changes in proteins, or more "trivial" issues as high-quality data in huge quantities.Therefore, this chapter focuses on a short introduction to various AI approaches to study protein-protein interactions, followed by a description of the most up-to-date algorithms and programs used for this purpose. Yet, given the considerable pace of development in this hot area of computational science, at the time you read this chapter, the development of the algorithms described, or the emergence of new (and better) ones should come as no surprise.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyMachine LearningMolecular Docking SimulationProteinsHumansProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MappingSoftwareProteinsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningProteinProtein–protein dockingProtein–protein interactionStructural biology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.