Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987463›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Approaches to Backbone Flexibility in Protein-Protein Docking.

Ayesha Asim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ayesha AsimDepartment of Synthesis and Chemical Technology of Pharmaceutical Substances with Computer Modeling Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are the fundamental organic macromolecules in living systems that play a key role in a variety of biological functions including immunological detection, intracellular trafficking, and signal transduction. The docking of proteins has greatly advanced during recent decades and has become a crucial complement to experimental methods. Protein-protein docking is a helpful method for simulating protein complexes whose structures have not yet been solved experimentally. This chapter focuses on major search tactics along with various docking programs used in protein-protein docking algorithms, which include: direct search, exhaustive global search, local shape feature matching, randomized search, and broad category of post-docking approaches. As backbone flexibility predictions and interactions in high-resolution protein-protein docking remain important issues in the overall optimization context, we have put forward several methods and solutions used to handle backbone flexibility. In addition, various docking methods that are utilized for flexible backbone docking, including ATTRACT, FlexDock, FLIPDock, HADDOCK, RosettaDock, FiberDock, etc., along with their scoring functions, algorithms, advantages, and limitations are discussed. Moreover, what progress in search technology is expected, including not only the creation of new search algorithms but also the enhancement of existing ones, has been debated. As conformational flexibility is one of the most crucial factors affecting docking success, more work should be put into evaluating the conformational flexibility upon binding for a particular case in addition to developing new algorithms to replace the rigid body docking and scoring approach.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProteinsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MappingSoftwareProteinsAlgorithmsBackbone flexibilityCAPRI benchmarkConfirmationsMonte CarloProteinprotein dockingprotein interaction (PPI)

Identifiers

PMID38987463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.