Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987460›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Docking Foundations: From Rigid to Flexible Docking.

Kamil J Kuder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kamil J KuderDepartment of Technology and Biotechnology of Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland. kamil.kuder@uj.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the development of methods for the experimental determination of protein structures, the dissonance between the number of known sequences and their solved structures is still enormous. This is particularly evident in protein-protein complexes. To fill this gap, diverse technologies have been developed to study protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in a cellular context including a range of biological and computational methods. The latter derive from techniques originally published and applied almost half a century ago and are based on interdisciplinary knowledge from the nexus of the fields of biology, chemistry, and physics about protein sequences, structures, and their folding. Protein-protein docking, the main protagonist of this chapter, is routinely treated as an integral part of protein research. Herein, we describe the basic foundations of the whole process in general terms, but step by step from protein representations through docking methods and evaluation of complexes to their final validation.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProteinsComputational BiologyProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MappingSoftwareProteinsDocking foundationsFlexible dockingPPIProteinprotein dockingRigid docking

Identifiers

PMID38987460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.