ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Optimizing coronary CT angiography quality with motion-compensated reconstruction for second-generation dual-layer spectral detector CT.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics of liver virtual non-contrast images from three-phase dynamic CT obtained with second-generation dual-layer spectral CT.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Motion correction algorithm improves right coronary artery image quality at heart rates > 75 bpm in non-ECG-gated coronary CT angiography.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Clinical evaluation of a motion correction software based on partial angle reconstruction in coronary CT angiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Optimising Generalisable Deep Learning Models for CT Coronary Segmentation: A Multifactorial Evaluation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Motion compensated reconstruction improves image quality and interpretability of dual-layer coronary CT angiography.European radiology · 2026Article
- Spectral computed tomography characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque: principles, imaging biomarkers, and clinical significance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Feasibility of alternative trigger deletion to improve 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography quality in patients with increased heart rate.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Optimizing coronary computed tomography angiography image quality with motion-compensated reconstruction: a prospective electrocardiogram-triggered mode with second-generation dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the effect of motion-compensated reconstruction (MCR) algorithm on improving the image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) using second-generation dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography (DLCT), and to evaluate the influence of heart rate (HR) on the motion-correction efficacy of this algorithm. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 127 patients who underwent CCTA for suspected coronary artery disease using second-generation DLCT. We divided the patients into two subgroups according to their average HR during scanning: the "HR < 75 bpm" group and the "HR ≥ 75 bpm" group. All images were reconstructed by the standard (STD) algorithm and MCR algorithm. Subjective image quality (4-point Likert scale), interpretability, and objective image quality between the STD and MCR in the whole population and within each subgroup were compared.
resultsMCR showed significantly higher Likert scores and interpretability than STD on the per-segment (3.58 ± 0.69 vs. 2.82 ± 0.93, 98.4% vs. 91.9%), per-vessel (3.12 ± 0.81 vs. 2.12 ± 0.74, 96.3% vs. 78.7%) and per-patient (2.57 ± 0.76 vs. 1.62 ± 0.55, 90.6% vs. 59.1%) levels (all p < 0.001). In the analysis of HR subgroups on a per-vessel basis of interpretability, significant differences were observed only in the right coronary artery in the low HR group, whereas significant differences were noted in three major coronary arteries in the high HR group. For objective image quality assessment, MCR significantly improved the SNR (13.22 ± 4.06 vs. 12.72 ± 4.06) and the contrast-to-noise ratio (15.84 ± 4.82 vs. 15.39 ± 4.38) compared to STD (both p < 0.001).
conclusionMCR significantly improves the subjective image quality, interpretability, and objective image quality of CCTA, especially in patients with higher HRs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The motion-compensated reconstruction algorithm of the second-generation dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography is helpful in improving the image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography in clinical practice, especially in patients with higher heart rates. KEY POINTS: Motion artifacts from cardiac movement affect the quality and interpretability of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). This motion-compensated reconstruction (MCR) algorithm significantly improves the image quality of CCTA in clinical practice. Image quality improvement by using MCR was more significant in the high heart rate group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38987398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.