ArticleJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2025
Relationships among hemolysis indicators and neuron-specific-enolase in patients undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Article in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Hemolytic Processes Due to Extracorporeal Support Therapy on the Serum Concentration of the Neuronal Marker Protein NSE.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Routine data analysis for moderate hemolysis interference correction in neuron specific enolase quantification.Biochemia medica · 2025Article
- Emergency ECMO Deployment During Liver Transplantation in Portopulmonary Hypertension Patients.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuron-specific-enolase is used as a marker of neurological prognosis after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. It is also present in red blood cells and platelets. It is not known whether hemolysis increases the values of neuron-specific-enolase enough to clinically affect its interpretation in critically ill patients who are to be introduced to veno-arterial extracorporeal oxygenation. In this study, we examined the relationships among neuron-specific-enolase and hemolysis indicators such as free hemoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase after the introduction of veno-arterial extracorporeal oxygenation. Of the 91 patients who underwent veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in our hospital from January 1, 2018, to February 24, 2021, 68 patients survived for more than 24 h. Of these, 14 patients who were categorized into the better cerebral performance categories (1-3) and 19 patients who were categorized into the poor neurological prognosis category (4) were included. After the introduction of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, neuron-specific-enolase was markedly higher in the poor neurological prognosis group than in the good neurological prognosis group (41.6 vs. 92.0, p = 0.04). A significant positive correlation was revealed between neuron-specific-enolase and free hemoglobin in the good neurological prognosis group (rs = 0.643, p = 0.0131). A similar relationship was observed for lactate dehydrogenase and neuron-specific-enolase in both the conscious (rs = 0.737, p = 0.00263) and non-conscious groups (rs = 0.544, p = 0.0176). When neuron-specific-enolase is used as a marker for neuroprognostic evaluation, an abnormally high value is likely to indicate the lack of consciousness, whereas a lower elevation should be interpreted with caution, taking into account the effects of hemolysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38987390What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.