Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987309›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Better performance of deep learning pulmonary nodule detection using chest radiography with pixel level labels in reference to computed tomography: data quality matters.

Jae Yong Kim, Wi-Sun Ryu, Dongmin Kim, Eun Young Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current trends and future directions of artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnosis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jae Yong KimArtificial Intelligence Research Center, JLK Inc., 5 Teheran-ro 33-gil, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Wi-Sun RyuArtificial Intelligence Research Center, JLK Inc., 5 Teheran-ro 33-gil, Seoul, Republic of Korea. wisunryu@gmail.com.
Dongmin KimArtificial Intelligence Research Center, JLK Inc., 5 Teheran-ro 33-gil, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun Young KimDepartment of Radiology, Incheon Sejong Hospital, 20, Gyeyangmunhwa-ro, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, 21080, Republic of Korea. oneshot0229@gmail.com.

Funding

Gil Medical Center, Gachon University FRD2021-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Labeling errors can significantly impact the performance of deep learning models used for screening chest radiographs. The deep learning model for detecting pulmonary nodules is particularly vulnerable to such errors, mainly because normal chest radiographs and those with nodules obscured by ribs appear similar. Thus, high-quality datasets referred to chest computed tomography (CT) are required to prevent the misclassification of nodular chest radiographs as normal. From this perspective, a deep learning strategy employing chest radiography data with pixel-level annotations referencing chest CT scans may improve nodule detection and localization compared to image-level labels. We trained models using a National Institute of Health chest radiograph-based labeling dataset and an AI-HUB CT-based labeling dataset, employing DenseNet architecture with squeeze-and-excitation blocks. We developed four models to assess whether CT versus chest radiography and pixel-level versus image-level labeling would improve the deep learning model's performance to detect nodules. The models' performance was evaluated using two external validation datasets. The AI-HUB dataset with image-level labeling outperformed the NIH dataset (AUC 0.88 vs 0.71 and 0.78 vs. 0.73 in two external datasets, respectively; both p < 0.001). However, the AI-HUB data annotated at the pixel level produced the best model (AUC 0.91 and 0.86 in external datasets), and in terms of nodule localization, it significantly outperformed models trained with image-level annotation data, with a Dice coefficient ranging from 0.36 to 0.58. Our findings underscore the importance of accurately labeled data in developing reliable deep learning algorithms for nodule detection in chest radiography.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsRadiography, ThoracicTomography, X-Ray ComputedData AccuracyHumansRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSolitary Pulmonary Nodule

Identifiers

PMID38987309
PMCPMC11237128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.