Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38987285›Full record

ArticleScientific data2024

A database of chemical absorption in human skin with mechanistic modeling applications.

Jessica N Stevens, Alyson K Prockter, Hunter A Fisher, Hien Tran, Marina V Evans

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica N StevensDepartment of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. jnsteven@ncsu.edu.
Alyson K ProckterDepartment of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Hunter A FisherOak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) assigned to United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Research and Development (ORD), Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Hien TranDepartment of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Marina V EvansUnited States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Center for Computational Toxicity and Exposure, Office of Research and Development (ORD), Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether from environmental and occupational hazards or from topical pharmaceuticals, the human skin comes into contact with various chemicals every day. In vivo experiments not only require large investments of both time and money, but in vivo experiments can also be unethical due to the need to intentionally or incidentally expose humans or animals to toxic chemicals. Comparatively, in vitro experiments offer ethical and financial advantages when combined with the opportunity to selectively choose chemicals for experimentation. With in vivo experimentation being so infeasible, many scientists have chosen to make their in vitro data available publicly. Using these data, a detailed database containing 73 chemicals was created with a robust set of descriptors to be used in connection with mathematical modeling to predict diffusion, permeability, and partition coefficients. This resulting database is tailored to be easily used in various coding languages.

Indexed as

SkinSkin AbsorptionDatabases, FactualHumansModels, BiologicalModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID38987285
PMCPMC11237069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.