ArticleChest2024
Association of RBC Transfusion Thresholds and Outcomes in Medical Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure Supported With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Chest, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Contemporary Guide of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Association between blood transfusion and early mortality in patient undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe hemoglobin value to trigger RBC transfusion for patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is controversial. Previous guidelines recommended transfusing to a normal hemoglobin level, but recent studies suggest that more RBC transfusions are associated with increased adverse outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is implementation of different institutional RBC transfusion thresholds for patients receiving venovenous ECMO associated with changes in RBC use and patient outcomes? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsThis single-center retrospective study of patients receiving venovenous ECMO used segmented regression to test associations between implementation of institutional transfusion thresholds and trends in RBC use. Associations with secondary outcomes, including in-hospital survival, also were assessed.
resultsThe study included 229 patients: 91 in the no threshold cohort, 48 in the hemoglobin < 8 g/dL cohort, and 90 in the hemoglobin < 7 g/dL cohort. Despite a decrease in number of RBC units transfused per day of ECMO support after implementation of different thresholds (mean ± SD: 0.6 ± 1.0 in the no threshold cohort, 0.3 ± 0.8 in the hemoglobin < 8 g/dL cohort, and 0.3 ± 1.1 in the hemoglobin < 7 g/dL cohort; P < .001), segmented regression showed no association between implementation of transfusion thresholds and changes in trends in number of RBC units per day of ECMO. We observed an increased hazard of death in the no threshold cohort compared with the hemoglobin < 8 g/dL cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.08; 95% CI, 1.12-3.88) and in the hemoglobin < 7 g/dL cohort compared with the hemoglobin < 8 g/dL cohort (aHR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.02-3.62). No difference was found in the hazard of death between the no threshold and hemoglobin < 7 g/dL cohorts (aHR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.69-1.69).
interpretationWe observed a decrease in number of RBC units per day of ECMO over time, but changes were not associated temporally with implementation of transfusion thresholds. A transfusion threshold of hemoglobin < 8 g/dL was associated with a lower hazard of death, but these findings are limited by study methodology. Further research is needed to investigate optimal RBC transfusion practices for patients supported with venovenous ECMO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.